SIR: Amid pressure, Karnataka CEO makes SIR notice list public

Published - September 07, 2026 06:01 am IST - Bengaluru

Booth Level Officers issuing notices to residents of R.T. Nagar as part of the SIR in Bengaluru on Friday. | Photo Credit: ALLEN EGENUSE J.

After sustained public pressure, with several people reporting that they had received notices at the last minute, leaving them with a narrow window to respond, the Karnataka Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) has made the notice list public.

A total of 43.81 lakh people across the State have been marked to receive notices.

The list can be accessed here: https://ceo.karnataka.gov.in/notices_issued.html

It does not specify the hearing venue, date or time. This leaves voters in the dark about when and where they are expected to appear, adding to the confusion and burden surrounding an already opaque process.

With hearings having begun on Thursday across Karnataka, the situation has left many people with no option but to miss their hearings because of the short notice and lack of prior information. The public can now access the list, with district-wise files uploaded on the website, similar to the ASDDO list.

While the list has been made public, it only indicates that a person has been marked for a notice. It does not specify the hearing venue, date or time. This leaves voters in the dark about when and where they are expected to appear, adding to the confusion and burden surrounding an already opaque process.

The major hurdle flagged by electors is that only the person issued the notice can appear for the hearing, and no one else can represent the voter at the hearing venue. Moreover, a hearing can be rescheduled only once, at the discretion of the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO).

Electors have also flagged that Booth Level Officers (BLOs) are not visiting voters’ homes to serve notices, but are instead asking them to collect the notices from the polling station, citing their duties at hearing venues. However, the hearings are to be conducted by the Assistant Electoral Registration Officer (AERO) or Electoral Registration Officer (ERO), not the BLOs.

Notices have been issued for two broad reasons: non-mapping, where a voter could not map their own or their parent’s details to the 2002 electoral rolls, and anomalies or “logical discrepancies”, such as an implausible age gap between an elector and their parents or grandparents, differences in the spelling of the father’s name, or a mismatch in the voter’s own name in cases of self-mapping.

However, while these are the stated reasons for generating notices, several people in Bengaluru have reported receiving notices despite having filled in all their details correctly.

Even where a voter has correctly provided all the required details and there is no actual logical discrepancy or mapping gap, being wrongly issued a notice does not spare them the inquiry. Recently, in Byatarayanapura, the Bengaluru DEO found that three people had been issued notices despite the mapping details they had provided being correct. Yet, the order still required them to appear for an inquiry. The entire burden continues to fall on the voter, even when the error is not theirs.

Published - September 07, 2026 06:01 am IST

Terms & conditions | Institutional Subscriber

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.